Or alternatively….who either owns or is working with who in the struggle to surpress the truth over how dangerous and damaging EMR technology is to the human race.
Environmentalists – who you’d assume would be keen to protect the health and well-being of humans and nature – are in fact more intent on promoting economic growth and pushing the (man made) climate change agenda, with the financial backing of telecom giants (O2, Talk Talk, BT) and energy firms (EDF, Shell), tech companies (HP, Sony) as well as the pharmaceutical industry (Alliance Boots), to the tune of some £2.5m per year.
Last week, prominent environmentalist Jonathan Porritt wrote an outrageous piece in the Independent newspaper, taking a cheap swipe at homeopathy and criticising the Green Party for not pushing through all the amazing and exciting opportunities for economic growth and job creation through smart meters and other future-oriented technologies. Yes, smart meters…those things pumping out EMRs throughout the air 24 hours a day. Must be good for the atmosphere, and for anything else.
This only makes sense when you take into account Porritt is part of “Forum For The Future” , a non-profit organisation that is effectively in the pocket of 90 major businesses (mostly in the financial, telecoms, new housing and energy sectors) and a few “traditional” green-leaning members such as WWF and Friends of the Earth, just to make it look less corporate.
What is fascinating is how a former figurehead for the Green Party is now in bed with all the companies who want to foist EMR saturation onto the public, in the name of climate change. And yet the Green Party itself, as a personal letter from one of its leading MEPs confirmed, is fundamentally opposed to unrestricted, untested wi-fi/EMR saturation. Since when did looking after nature involve installing cancerous technology in every home?
So, this Forum For The Future can be added to the mysterious Governance For The Internet Of Things. Along with Cancer Research UK, who have their funding paid by Hutchinson/3 Mobile and who brazenly claim that mobiles are safe, and phone masts are even safer. And of course our NHS, who true to form are burying their heads in the sand and denying the very existence of ES (and even MCS!) despite all the evidence to the contrary.
It helps to know who and what we are actually dealing with, and who is really pulling the strings behind some of the UK’s supposedly trustworthy institutions. Knowledge is power.
Nobody would imagine that environmentalists are only interested in making money with the big businesses, or that a cancer research charity would surrender its integrity to a Hong Kong telecom company, or that a National Health Service designed to look after its people could knowingly refuse to acknowledge a mountain of worlwide evidence.
But this is where we are.
NoMoreWifi 
Jonathan Porritt and others like him have sold us all down the river. They are so weighed down with hypocrisy its surprising they don’t fall in themselves.
Foisting a known toxic radiation on the general public puts paid to his credentials as an environmentalist.
Hopefully the whole sordid corrupt fraud will be exposed soon and individuals like Porrit will be held accountable for criminally misleading the public, damaging health and destroying our environment for decades to come. .
Thank you Eric.
I am going to get the blogs together with links, (probably in Forum, as I feel that will be a good thing for information and communication of the users of Mast-victims Forum.
Best regards.
Agnes